You know what’s wrong with this world? You can’t trust anybody.
Take Lane Byrant. About a week ago, it releases the story that both ABC and Fox networks have banned its new lingerie ad on the basis that the ad exposes too much cleavage. Oh, says Lane Byrant. So Victoria’s Secret can flaunt lingerie-clad model-perfect bodies on primetime TV, but when the women are plus-sized, it’s another story. That’s discrimination, the company cries!
If you haven’t seen the ad, you can check it out on the LaneBryantCurves YouTube channel here.
Incidentally, or maybe not, the so-called BANNED ad has over 2,000,000 views on the Lane Bryant YouTube channel alone, ranking it one of the top ten most viewed videos of the week.
After watching it, I think you’ll agree: the gal’s got some bazooboos. And yes, the ad is sort of saucy, but not really. Certainly it’s no saucier than Pamela Anderson has ever been, parading around her floatation devices, which are currently on display on this season’s Dancing With The Stars.
Now we hear that the whole thing was just a publicity stunt. ABC says it never banned the commercial. Fox says it didn’t have a problem with the ad either. You can read the FoxNews.com story here.
So who’s telling the truth? Probably nobody. Meanwhile, no one’s panties are in a wad over the 30-second Reebok spot that shows a montage of nothing but little hot butts in little boy shorts.
So what have we learned? Controversy sells. News isn’t always reliable. And short attention spans or not, big bazooboos are still the quickest way to get people’s attention.






